| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Airbolt |
Posted - 19/01/2012 : 18:14:40
You couldn't make it up!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2088124/The-Artist-Cinema-goers-demand-refunds-realising-movie-silent.html
|
| 8 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| TitanPa |
Posted - 30/01/2012 : 12:54:07
If that is the case. Can I get half my money back for Cast Away???? Half the movie was silent. |
| Airbolt |
Posted - 29/01/2012 : 16:51:54
As the scenario might have played out 
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/10/liverpooltitle.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/545/iverpool1.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/696/iverpool2.png/ |
| randall |
Posted - 22/01/2012 : 20:33:42
quote:
Originally posted by Airbolt
George Lucas owes a lot of people for the prequels!
Except for #3: now THAT one was good! |
| Airbolt |
Posted - 22/01/2012 : 18:55:57
George Lucas owes a lot of people for the prequels! |
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 22/01/2012 : 13:58:17
After seeing this film, I think that we should get full refunds for all the crap 3D movies and maybe some kind of a partial retroactive refund for some of the crap sound and color films Hollywood has dished out. This, on the other hand, was worth every penny we paid to see it in the theater!
|
| randall |
Posted - 20/01/2012 : 21:16:44
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
Maybe not a refund but a discount might perhaps be in order. After all, you pay more for an extra dimension, so why not less for no sound?
 |
| benj clews |
Posted - 20/01/2012 : 11:40:09
Maybe not a refund but a discount might perhaps be in order. After all, you pay more for an extra dimension, so why not less for no sound? |
| randall |
Posted - 19/01/2012 : 22:18:34
Hilarious! [What pro-rated part should Terrence Malick have returned? And *forget* 2001!]
It could also have happened over here, tho: the reason Gus Van Sant actually got the money to re-shoot PSYCHO was because "kids don't like black-and-white-movies any more." Feh. |
