| Author |
 Topic  |
|
ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"
Israel
|
 Posted - 15/03/2010 : 10:44:51
|
Cool!
Done, and thanks!
|
 |
|
|
BiggerBoat 
"Pass me the harpoon"
London, UK
|
Posted - 22/03/2010 : 22:19:47
|
Please could you add me to the sub-100 total votes?
Also, should I be in the top 1000 total one? I don't have 1000 reviews!
Cheers
BB
|
|
|
|
BiggerBoat
"Pass me the harpoon"
London, UK
|
Posted - 22/03/2010 : 23:54:17
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by BiggerBoat
Please could you add me to the sub-100 total votes?
Nope, because you're in the top 100 by total votes (easily).  The wording seemed unambiguous to me when I made it, as it parallels all the 'Top F.W.F.R.ers by...' though with the list designed to no longer duplicate Benj's one, but I see that it is not really that obvious. It might be clearer once I have had time to order the entries. Otherwise I might try to reword it.
quote:
Also, should I be in the top 1000 total one? I don't have 1000 reviews!
Yup. You can think of it as 'Top F.W.F.R.ers by Top up-to-1,000 Total'; I just didn't want to be untidy. You (and others in your category), just have your 1,000th review defined as having 0 votes: your statistic will remain accurate until that changes, so much longer than most others in fact.
Ah. I thought the first one was those not in the top 100total reviews. Still seems strange to be in the second one - I would have thought you should have to have 1000 reviews to even qualify. It's your stat though I suppose. |
|
|
|
SixFourian
"Four ever European"
The European Union
|
Posted - 23/03/2010 : 00:10:11
|
quote:
Originally posted by BiggerBoat
Still seems strange to be in the second one - I would have thought you should have to have 1000 reviews to even qualify.
Well, the point of it is to do a quality comparison without disadvantaging more selective people (as the total-votes list does) or less selective people (as the average-votes list does). The 1,000 reviews isn't a requirement like the 5,000 votes is. It would seem strange to me to exclude people who would be included once they reached 1,000 reviews even if they never received another vote. |
Edited by - SixFourian on 23/03/2010 00:14:43 |
|
|
|
BiggerBoat
"Pass me the harpoon"
London, UK
|
Posted - 23/03/2010 : 00:33:24
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
It would seem strange to me to exclude people who would be included once they reached 1,000 reviews even if they never received another vote.
Okay, I see where you're coming from.
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Top F.W.F.R.ers by...
