| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Tori 
"I don't get it...."
|
 Posted - 04/27/2007 : 06:36:25
|
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
It's nice to see that the begging for cross-voting - "a victimless crime"? - is unconstrained by such bourgeois concepts as ethics.
I didn't ask for votes, I just said I didn't have many.  |
 |
|
|
BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 04/27/2007 : 08:10:45
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tori
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
It's nice to see that the begging for cross-voting - "a victimless crime"? - is unconstrained by such bourgeois concepts as ethics.
I didn't ask for votes, I just said I didn't have many.
Yeah ... but now you got some anyway. Gift-wrapped and tied with tinsel 
|
|
|
|
Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
Posted - 04/27/2007 : 10:49:40
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tori
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
It's nice to see that the begging for cross-voting - "a victimless crime"? - is unconstrained by such bourgeois concepts as ethics.
I didn't ask for votes, I just said I didn't have many.
You just don't get it. 
Votes should be given because people think the review was worthy, and not part of a devaluating vote-swapping exercise.
I'm not saying that people should not advertise their reviews, as on FYC etc.
"I'll look at yours if you look at mine" is one thing, but "I will vote for yours if you vote for mine" is overstepping the mark IMNSHO. 
|
|
|
|
Rovark
"Luck-pushing, rule-bending, chance-taking reviewer"
|
Posted - 04/27/2007 : 18:36:52
|
quote:
Originally posted by thefoxboy
quote:
Originally posted by Rovark
quote:
Originally posted by Josh_the_cat
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe
So how come I STILL have 350 FWFRs with NO VOTES WHATSOEVER?!!!
If it's a competition then I beat you with 832 0 voters. Anyone care to take up the challenge?
Josh the cat
Call that a challenge. Pah!
3101 reviews. 49.6% with 0 votes
That's um.... a lot more than 832
edit 1538 
That's less than half of mine.
approx. 3133
I used to chase accolades, so I have plenty of boring accolade fillers. I gave up chasing accolades, though I still have some fillers pending. I just can't bring myself to delete reviews.
Oh great.
I can't even win the biggest zero(s) contest dammit!
Oh well, I'm in good company, as always on this site.  |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 04/27/2007 : 20:02:58
|
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
quote:
Originally posted by Tori
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
It's nice to see that the begging for cross-voting - "a victimless crime"? - is unconstrained by such bourgeois concepts as ethics.
I didn't ask for votes, I just said I didn't have many.
You just don't get it.
Votes should be given because people think the review was worthy, and not part of a devaluating vote-swapping exercise.
I'm not saying that people should not advertise their reviews, as on FYC etc.
"I'll look at yours if you look at mine" is one thing, but "I will vote for yours if you vote for mine" is overstepping the mark IMNSHO.
Amen!!!
But a wise man once said. If you can't beat em. Join em. |
|
|
|
Yukon
"Co-editor of FWFR book"
|
Posted - 04/27/2007 : 21:27:10
|
| I love checking in my account and discovering a whack of votes for my reviews. It's a good way to start the morning. |
Edited by - Yukon on 04/27/2007 21:29:51 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Blowing own vote trumpet
