| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
 Posted - 12/07/2008 : 09:00:37
|
Hi all
Time of the year when we Webby judges are asked to suggest websites for consideration for this year's awards.
I'll be very happy to pass on your particular favorites. Just post them here.
TIA bigtime!
|
|
|
w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"
|
|
|
BaftaBaby
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 12/07/2008 : 15:24:02
|
quote:
Originally posted by wildheartlivie
I'm fairly fond of http://www.icanhascheezburger.com myself, though it may not be up to Webbies standards.
Ta, whl!
Funnily enough one of the other judges nominated it yesterday! I think it was the much-missed Tori who first told us about it here. I love it!! 
|
 |
|
|
Sal[Au]pian
"Four ever European"
|
|
|
BaftaBaby
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 12/07/2008 : 20:14:04
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
www.demotix.com
Many thanks, Sal. On first glimpse it looks very useful. Would you mind telling me why you feel it's better than flickr or any of the other photo sites available?
TIA!
|
|
|
|
Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 00:31:38
|
http://www.metal-archives.com/
My life would have no meaning without it. 
I second the icanhascheezburger nomination, but that site is so well known and been around long enough that wouldn't it's time have been a year or two ago? If it hasn't already been nominated then I don't know why not... |
|
|
|
Sal[Au]pian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 02:44:12
|
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
www.demotix.com
Many thanks, Sal. On first glimpse it looks very useful. Would you mind telling me why you feel it's better than flickr or any of the other photo sites available?
Unless I'm misunderstanding Flickr (which I haven't used), it's not really the same sort of thing. The point of it is for ordinary people anywhere in the world to upload photos and videos of a quality that news media may want to use. Part of the thinking behind it is that there are far fewer overseas correspondents than there used to be; indeed, most newspapers do not have any at all. Another issue is that journalists are nowadays often banned from the places most needing reporting. I haven't uploaded anything myself as I don't have a good enough camera and also don't ever go anywhere exciting, but I think it's a great idea. It also seems to be taking off reasonably well as they are always sending out updates about where stuff has been used. |
|
|
|
Sal[Au]pian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 02:46:21
|
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
I second the icanhascheezburger nomination, but that site is so well known and been around long enough that wouldn't it's time have been a year or two ago? If it hasn't already been nominated then I don't know why not...
Yep, you're on the money there. Lolcats reached a critical mass a little while ago: one is always hearing about them everywhere e.g. in the free papers (which are not exactly boundary-pushing). |
|
|
|
BaftaBaby
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 08:43:28
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
www.demotix.com
Many thanks, Sal. On first glimpse it looks very useful. Would you mind telling me why you feel it's better than flickr or any of the other photo sites available?
Unless I'm misunderstanding Flickr (which I haven't used), it's not really the same sort of thing. The point of it is for ordinary people anywhere in the world to upload photos and videos of a quality that news media may want to use. Part of the thinking behind it is that there are far fewer overseas correspondents than there used to be; indeed, most newspapers do not have any at all. Another issue is that journalists are nowadays often banned from the places most needing reporting. I haven't uploaded anything myself as I don't have a good enough camera and also don't ever go anywhere exciting, but I think it's a great idea. It also seems to be taking off reasonably well as they are always sending out updates about where stuff has been used.
Ah, I see! Sounds a worthy nominee and I'll suggest it. Big thanks.
|
|
|
|
BaftaBaby
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 10:50:48
|
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
http://www.metal-archives.com/
My life would have no meaning without it.
I second the icanhascheezburger nomination, but that site is so well known and been around long enough that wouldn't it's time have been a year or two ago? If it hasn't already been nominated then I don't know why not...
I've suggested your metal site - many thanks!
re: lolcats - as I said it was already nominated by another judge -- we have to remember that the webbies is to raise the profile of worthy sites among those who don't already know about them, not among webnerds like us!!   
|
|
|
|
Sean
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 11:16:41
|
Yeah, I was just surprised it wasn't done a couple of years ago, it's been a household name (I think?) for a while now. But if it's never been in the running (due to no nomination) until now, then it's a most worthy contender (for best lolcat site at the very least ).
NEEDZ MOAR LOLCATZ NAO PLZ KTHXBAI!!!11!!1!
|
Edited by - Sean on 12/08/2008 21:26:26 |
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 13:02:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
http://www.metal-archives.com/
My life would have no meaning without it.
Cool. 99% of it goes right over my head, but 1% of it represents my lost youth 
Metallica, Anthrax, Megadeth, Saxon, Maiden, Scorpions, MSG ... wow, I almost feel 18 again just thinking about it
Somehow ac/dc don't seem to be listed. They may have become mainstream, but they were as much a metal band as any of the others above  And they were by far the best live band I've seen (they played on the same line-up as Metallica, and outclassed them. Granted that they headlined, so had all the advantages, but I was a mad Metallica fan) |
|
|
|
Sean
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 12/08/2008 : 21:25:39
|
quote:
Originally posted by bife
Somehow ac/dc don't seem to be listed.
I don't think of AC/DC as 'metal', I think of them as rock 'n' roll with heavy guitars. Actually, they've never considered themselves metal either.
There was a day when Led Zep were considered 'metal' too, but I know few people these days who'd think so. There's sometimes a fine line between rock and metal, and some end up on the 'rock' side of the line. The presence of heavy guitars generally isn't enough to class music as 'metal', structurally it needs to deviate far enough from the classic 'pop' structure that a pop/rock classification couldn't apply.
Yeah, people argue about this a lot. |
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 12/09/2008 : 03:35:13
|
I hear you, but I might have expected Saxon, Scorpions and Maiden to be classed in whatever category AC/DC found themselves in
Still, nice site |
|
|
|
Sean
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 12/09/2008 : 08:42:13
|
Yeah, they're just not 'metal' enough to be 'metal'. They call themselves 'rock 'n' roll', Wiki calls them 'hard rock' so there you have it. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and if they were 'let in' then you'd also have to let in Pink Floyd, The Who, Led Zep etc. It's "Metal Archives", not "Metal and Hard Rock Archives".
There are a few ways that a hard rock band could get an entry, one way is if prominent band member(s) have associated acts that are clearly metal, e.g., "Hardingrock" are a Norwegian folk/rock outfit who are definitely not 'metal' but one of their principals is a major member of various Norwegian black metal bands, so they get an entry. This doesn't apply to AC/DC. Another way is if a rock band has at least one release that's clearly metal then they get an entry.
AC/DC generally conform to the 'verse/chorus/verse' structure and 4:4 time that's intrinsically associated with pop/rock'n'roll etc, and all they've done is crank up the distortion level. That's not enough to make them metal. In a nutshell:-
Rock = pop + heavy guitars
Metal = classical + heavy guitars
but obviously it's a lot more complicated, e.g. folk metal.  |
|
|
|
BaftaBaby
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 12/09/2008 : 09:19:48
|
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
Metal = classical + heavy guitars
Mmm - Mozart's Fantasia in C with heavy guitars? Could be good! 
And, now, b4 this thread gets its own audio track  -- would anyone else like me to nominate his/her fav site for a Webby Award?
Cheers!
|
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Any suggestions?
