| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| randall |
Posted - 09/10/2004 : 23:27:53
I've made the same mistake, so I can appreciate this one, but Julie doffs her shirt in S.O.B., not "10".
|
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 05/01/2014 : 11:21:40
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
The oldest five reviews here all wrongly refer to Owen Wilson being in the film.
Right you are!
Yours is rightly top anyway.  |
| lemmycaution |
Posted - 05/01/2014 : 05:06:15
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
The oldest five reviews here all wrongly refer to Owen Wilson being in the film.
Right you are! |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 05/01/2014 : 02:05:58
The oldest five reviews here all wrongly refer to Owen Wilson being in the film. |
| TitanPa |
Posted - 29/11/2010 : 03:53:20
quote:
Originally posted by 1i1anPa
Rapunzel Unbraided/Tangled
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0398286/
Kristin Chenoweth is no longer associated with this film. Two reviews are now incorrect.
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?sort=5&dir=2&id=13923&Mode=&Rows=1&Start=1&do=
Kristen is not the voice of Rapunzel |
| TitanPa |
Posted - 06/04/2010 : 21:01:39
Rapunzel Unbraided/Tangled
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0398286/
Kristin Chenoweth is no longer associated with this film. Two reviews are now incorrect. |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 24/03/2010 : 23:46:18
As napper has pointed out elsewhere, the Ewan McGregor reviews here are obsolete. |
| AC |
Posted - 23/03/2010 : 18:34:47
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?id=36101
Sadly for every review on the page, Keira Knightley won't be playing Eliza Doolittle in this abhorrent remake. I have a review pending for the current Carey Mulligan rumour, but since that's being denied by the actress I'm sure mine will go out of style too.
Still, the Keira puns are old hat. |
| Cheese_Ed |
Posted - 23/03/2010 : 13:33:12
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?ID=25990
This is one of a series of industrial films about the meat packing industry and this installment is about singe-ing pigs feet, which burns the hair off of the skin. You can read about the singeing step in many recipes for roasting a pig whole or pickling pigs feet.
It isn't about harmonizing hooves. Singing is either an obsolete spelling or a typo. |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 09/03/2010 : 13:21:06
A lot of these reviews don't really work so well now. |
| Downtown |
Posted - 12/09/2007 : 15:17:56
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
So what should be done with all the reviews of The Dark Knight that refer to its now-defunct working title?
Nothing, I guess...okay.
Not that it's that big a deal, but all the reviews of American Beauty that refer to molestation, pedophilia, and rape really aren't accurate at all. But based on past experience I can't imagine anyone will really find that interesting. |
| Downtown |
Posted - 18/04/2007 : 20:45:18
So what should be done with all the reviews of The Dark Knight that refer to its now-defunct working title? |
| w22dheartlivie |
Posted - 23/02/2007 : 22:35:15
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
I'm not advocating deleting anything, but I want to stress for future reviewers that We Are Marshall really isn't about that football team that got killed in that horrible tragedy. It's about what happened after that.
For what it's worth, on the IMDB page for We Are Marshall, the MPAA rating says "Rated PG for emotional thematic material, a crash scene, and mild language." I haven't seen it either, but apparently the crash is shown in some way. |
| turrell |
Posted - 13/02/2007 : 22:54:48
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?id=14811
This film was made in 1993. The fight where Tyson bit off a piece of Holyfield's ear was 1997, four years later. Most of the reviews of this film are wrong. They're not describing this film.
Yes his fall in the case of the movie is mostly around his rape conviction in 1992. |
| Downtown |
Posted - 13/02/2007 : 21:50:14
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?id=14811
This film was made in 1993. The fight where Tyson bit off a piece of Holyfield's ear was 1997, four years later. Most of the reviews of this film are wrong. They're not describing this film. |
| Rovark |
Posted - 12/01/2007 : 21:24:02
SPOILER BELOW for "Identity"
I've just seen and submitted a review for Identity
I noticed there's a lot of reviews that refer to Cusack having multiple personalities or 'being' or 'playing' someone else. He is actually one of the personalities so these reviews are all incorrect. |
