The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 Off-Topic
 General
 Ramble ramble
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  15:13:51  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Just some transatlantic musings, really. As you know I transplanted myself from NYC to the UK some 40 years ago -- with a slight nearly two year return to LA in the mid-1970s.

Anyway, I often think about the subtle cultural differences between our two nations divided by the common language. No, this ain't about politics!

There's something that took me a long time to 'get' about the British attitude towards Americans. Yeah, I guess it's somewhat patronizing, but that's not really it.

Here's what occurred to me as an example:

[not all] Americans say Paris, France; Rome, Italy; Geneva, Switzerland.

And Brits do their inner smile, that beneficent smile of amusement, the same one you'd flash to a 3-year-old announcing for the first time that rain is wet, as though s/he'd discovered the fact.

Most Americans don't 'get' that, but I think it's as close as I can come to explaining how the Brits feel about the Yanks - most of the time. When silly politics and such doesn't get in the way.

Ramble, ramble through the bramble. Hey ho!

Wheelz 
"FWFR%u2019ing like it%u2019s 1999"

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  18:25:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think I sort of get what you're saying... but we also [not always] say Phoenix, Arizona; Cleveland, Ohio; even New York, New York -- Not because we think people don't know where those cities are, but just because it sounds natural. Place names are just structured that way in the American dialect.

(Or perhaps we're simply trying to differentiate them from Paris, Texas; Rome, Georgia; and Geneva, Illinois...)
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  20:00:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wheelz

I think I sort of get what you're saying... but we also [not always] say Phoenix, Arizona; Cleveland, Ohio; even New York, New York -- Not because we think people don't know where those cities are, but just because it sounds natural. Place names are just structured that way in the American dialect.

(Or perhaps we're simply trying to differentiate them from Paris, Texas; Rome, Georgia; and Geneva, Illinois...)



Yeah, it's the latter. 'Cause I don't think I've heard Shanghai, China ... or Cape Town, South Africa

I think what triggers the European feeling of not-quite-superiority is that assumption that anyone in the civilized world would ever think of Texas when hearing the word Paris.

I'm not blaming anyone ... just always trying to figure out curious behaviours/behaviors

BTW - and perhaps New Yorkers are different -- up to the time I left the States, aged 26, I never heard anyone say Cleveland, Ohio. We just knew where it was. Of course, lots has changed linguistically since then.

What I do know is that Americans abroad have to really work hard to be taken seriously. Ironically, I've found that leading with humour/humor seems to work!

Now, where did I put that tin of humour. I just know it's here somewhere!

Go to Top of Page

Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  20:30:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote


So how does "Boise, Idaho" fit into this theory?

They always say "Boise, Idaho" but there is only one Boise, and everyone knows it's in Idaho.

I demand an explanation! Now!









Go to Top of Page

lemmycaution 
"Long mired in film"

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  21:15:45  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Here in Canada we never say Kapuskasing, Ontario.
Go to Top of Page

Wheelz 
"FWFR%u2019ing like it%u2019s 1999"

Posted - 04/08/2008 :  23:59:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution

Here in Canada we never say Kapuskasing, Ontario.

I couldn't if I wanted to.
Go to Top of Page

shoon 
"Five(ish?) years as a fwiffer"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  00:58:01  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper



So how does "Boise, Idaho" fit into this theory?

They always say "Boise, Idaho" but there is only one Boise, and everyone knows it's in Idaho.

I demand an explanation! Now!


There are other Boises, plus it means you don't get confused with the moderately successful college football team.
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  06:21:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Actually, it seems to me that Americans will (mostly) say the name of an American city without the state, but when it comes to places abroad, will add the country to the city's name. This is less the case when Europeans talk about cities throughout the world, including the USA.

(And just so you know, I can't tell you how many very educated, well traveled people I've met on this side of the pond - UK included - who wouldn't be able to tell you that city of Chicago is in the state of Illinois! But I can't complain. There are also lots Americans who don't know this!)
Go to Top of Page

thefoxboy 
"Four your eyes only."

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  07:01:02  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
An American once asked me where I was from, I said Australia, she said oh, that's part of New Zealand isn't it!
That was in a niteclub in NYC, so maybe she had too much to drink.
Go to Top of Page

bife 
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  10:24:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
When I told them I was moving to Singapore, most of my family weren't sure which country it was in



For those of you on facebook, you should try out the App Traveller IQ Challenge - you basically get given a city name, a flag or a landmark and have to stick a marker on a map to show where you think it is. You can play on a country map, regional map or a world map, and you can even play some 'user designed' games and try to place anything from nightclubs to football clubs

It is very addictive, and more fun than it sounds (that, or I am just a sad git)

Foxy and Conan are both pretty good at it (well they usually beat me, anyway)

Edited by - bife on 04/09/2008 10:41:45
Go to Top of Page

MguyXXVI 
"X marks the spot"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  15:11:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Aren't we generalizing a bit much here?

I've lived in the States my entire life, and I remember only the rareset of times ever identifying their host country/state while speaking about Paris, London, Sydney, Moscow or Kapuskasing (well, maybe not so much Sydney).

About 50% of the time, I refer to my birthtown of Portland, Oregon as such because I am all too aware that it is the namesake of Portland, Maine, which is an important distinction to all Portland, Oregon schoolchildren who are repeatedly told that goddamned story about Alfred Lovejoy, who named the city Portland after winning a bet with some freakin' jerk who wanted to name it Boston! That's kind of a pride thing.

And while I refer to Glendale, Arizona as such, I also don't refer to New York, Chicago, St. Louis, Dallas or my home L.A. by reference to their state locations, since I assume the states are a given for such well-known cities. Indeed, nearly no one I know apparently feels compelled to announce these many geographical sirnames, and likely for the same reason.

However, I would hazard two hypotheses on the matter.

[DISCLAIMER: I'm not directing this at you, BB, but you brought up a topic that generates a very acute feeling on my part. My observations are not directed at you. ]

  • First, and quite contrary to the over-used, stuck-up, ill-informed, jingoistic, and condescending use of the "ugly American," "imperialistic American," "self-absorbed American" or "stupid American" stereotypes -- use of which I abhor as abominally ignorant -- it is perhaps the case that some Americans are merely trying to be helpful and/or polite, choosing not to presume that their conversation partner is a compendium of geographical knowledge. Let us remember that many people all around the world are fairly uninformed of the names of even world capitals. Not because they are stupid people, but because that information is not included in the lexicon of their daily survival needs. I would hardly look down my nose at a Maori tribesman, Andean Native, Australian Aboriginal, Bantu herder, Chembakolli villager or Shaolin monk who took the time to identify precisely the name and province of any world location. Rather than to assume they presume stupidity on my part or superiority on their part to trigger insulting (because that's what it is), even if "benign," patronizing looks, I choose to assume that they are being helpful in their own way, which does not need my condescention to mock or stunt that expression. This precise topic infuriates me because I am sick to death of anti-American snobbery and the extent to which some non-U.S. persons will go to presume some belittling notion of persons from the U.S. (or should I say "the United States of America.") It is incorrect, it is morally bankrupt, and it is -- in the highest sense of irony -- supremely ignorant. I deal with a lot of non-U.S. nationals who call me by my combined first and sirname. I view it as charming and endearing; I'd sooner bludgeon myself to death than to entertain the idea that they are somehow culturally or intellectually at fault. Maybe that's their custom! Who appointed me culture czar to dictate that they must adopt all local customs, idioms and ideosyncracies when addressing we locals??!!!!??? And why would I presume that my patronizing smile goes unnoticed by them???!!!??? Why wouldn't they feel insulted and belittled?: they can see!!!??? JUST BECAUSE THEY DON'T ACT LIKE ME DOESN'T MEAN THEY DON'T HAVE THE CAPACITY TO SENSE THEIR SURROUNDINGS! Polite people are careful to avoid obvious though even unintended insults.

    And please note that I did not single out Europeans, Britons, Chinese, "U.S.A.-ians" or any other national group as principal perpetrators of this snobbish fascism. I single out only the idiots who do it. For example, here in the States, I have no qualms verbally taking issue with the freaking idiots who take great joy in mocking the accent of Indian nationals who work at and own nearly 75% of the multi-billion dollar motel industry in the U.S: what cretin cannot see that the people being mocked are industrious, savvy, and deserving of admiration for their hard work? I assure you this cretin can. (Hmmmm ... somehow that doesn't sound right, but I can't quite put one of my thirteen fingers on it.)

    This reminds me of a sensation that occurred to me a couple of decades ago when I spent a good deal of time in the U.K. I was in my early 20s and was dating a very lovely British girl [*longing sigh*] who happily toured me around portions of the country [see Facebook for pictures]. Her family were the sweetest. Her friends were charming and sometimes even overly helpful. I met many absolutely wonderful British people. However, I also had ample occasion to run into idiots who tried their damnedest to mock me for being an American, or to denegrate the U.S., one such person who even denegrated my hometown -- to which he'd never been! I could offer several alternate explanations for such behavior -- jealousy, insecurity, excessive onanism, inbreeding -- but what I would not and do not presume is a national culture of such an attitude.


  • Accordingly, it may be more accurate to characterize the initial observation as "the attitude of some people in the U.K. toward Americans" rather than the "British attitude toward Americans," as I am loathe to think of so many lovely people as bitter, boorish, and oblivious.

  • Second, I tend to believe it is a matter of relative education and/or world travel. I find that people of more extensive education and/or travel tend to leave out geographical sirnames, as I believe many of them are used to speaking with others whom they assume are already aware of the particular locality because of the conversational context. Much like persons from Miami do not speak to each other of "Miami, Florida."
More wine anyone?

Edited by - MguyXXVI on 04/09/2008 15:46:55
Go to Top of Page

Beanmimo 
"August review site"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  15:46:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
To throw an Irish perspective (prepare not to be bowled over here people, it's me after all) but I lived for over three years in an Irish town called Laragh.

It is forty minutes south of Dublin across the Co. Wicklow border.

Despite the fact that there are three othe towns in different counties also called Laragh none are ever referred to as Laragh, Co. Wicklow, Laragh, Co. Kildare etc.

I think we just presume (maybe with arrogance) that you are
"thinking of the Laragh that i'm talking about."

By the way Laragh, Co. Wicklow is a beautiful little village only ten minutes away from stunning Glendalough and definately worth a visit even of you are on Dublin for a weekend.

I'll un plug now!!

Edited by - Beanmimo on 04/09/2008 15:48:15
Go to Top of Page

Sal[Au]pian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  16:10:24  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
You've picked out a good one, B.B. For some reason, it's just so, so irritating. Perhaps it's down to equating American states with whole countries. And it's not just done in cases where there is ambiguity. One hears "London, England" all the time, and let's not imagine that they are clarifying that it's not the Canadian one in most cases. Even if it's not the norm, it seems so because it stands out. In on-screen text in films, it's almost always the case - I am consciously pleased when just the city is named. The city-country format just sounds so twee and sing-songy.

In response to MguyX's point, in the pragmatics (in the technical sense) of language there's just as much imperative to not give too much information as to not give too little. Speakers of course make errors in judgement in both directions all the time, but they do of necessity judge what knowledge the listener already has. It's thus just as rude to assume too little as too much.

It's often my impression that, let's say some (but I really do think many) Americans, do not have a very accurate idea of how much other people know about the United States. The reason for this, I suspect, is that in the U.S. almost all television programming and other media is American. This means that Americans see less about other countries than non-Americans do unless they make special effort, and they do not realise how much American media everyone else sees. Media representations of course may fail to be accurate, but television and films mean that e.g. we have a consistent sense of the American high school system and some sense of what each state is like (albeit sketchy in the case of obscure ones like Nebraska or North Dakota), amongst a huge range of other knowledge.

And don't get me onto saying "England" when they are talking about the U.K. or buying and wearing 'Oxford University' matching sweatshirts and jogging bottoms in London.
Go to Top of Page

Sal[Au]pian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  16:19:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
In terms of my own judgement of relating British geography to Americans, I do think I am fair. When asked where I am from I say the Midlands. I think it's safe to assume that most Americans don't know where Shropshire is (since neither do many British people, for whom I say "between Birmingham and Wales"), whilst they will either know or be able to guess from the name the location of the Midlands. In terms of cities, I would assume they would know that Manchester and Liverpool are in northern England, but I would not assume that they would know where Birmingham is, although it is bigger. Birmingham, Alabama probably contributes to this and so "BirmingHAM, England" is not so bad as some other cases.
Go to Top of Page

Sal[Au]pian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  16:32:39  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think all this offering of extra information fits in with one of the overriding issues between Americans' and Britons' interpretations of each other. To us, Americans (e.g. in the audience of television shows) seem overenthusiastic and fake (whooping away at the most fractionally funny lines), whereas to Americans we come across as cold, reserved and underenthusiastic/unsupportive. This of course is only a case of the peak numbers of people being at a slightly different point on the effusiveness spectrum, but it's sufficiently noticeable as a trend that it marks out a national distinction.
Go to Top of Page

Sal[Au]pian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/09/2008 :  16:39:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by thefoxboy

An American once asked me where I was from, I said Australia, she said oh, that's part of New Zealand isn't it!

As an aside, I saw a friend the other day who now lives in Australia. (I was going to go there this February/March till my redundancy and back/leg pain stopped me. ) He's not completely happy there, but his wife is keen to stay (for triathloning amongst other reasons). I asked why they didn't consider New Zealand, as it seems beautiful and varied. He reacted as though it were a ridiculous suggestion. When I asked why, he said the people were just boring! ( Sean)

Edited by - Sal[Au]pian on 04/09/2008 16:39:41
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000